From 8cd1811b1f0d0e2377029decf128e0f56cfbaec8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Kauffman Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:48:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Two ** is bold --- content/faq/naming.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/faq/naming.md b/content/faq/naming.md index 2b1fdbb2..a6c9fc22 100644 --- a/content/faq/naming.md +++ b/content/faq/naming.md @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ title: LBRY’s naming system seems kinda crazy. Why don’t you just assign names the same way as internet domains? category: LBRY 101 --- -First, since there have been a lot of misconceptions about how LBRY URLs work, *it is absolutely possible to own and control a URL forever*. That is the tl;dr of this post if you don't want to read a bunch of words about how LBRY URLs work. +First, since there have been a lot of misconceptions about how LBRY URLs work, **it is absolutely possible to own and control a URL forever**. That is the tl;dr of this post if you don't want to read a bunch of words about how LBRY URLs work. Assigning names optimally is a difficult problem in centralized systems. It becomes nearly impossible in decentralized ones. Just because we’re all accustomed to certain solutions doesn’t mean they aren’t seriously flawed.