Update 38-information-gatekeepers-make-our-culture-sick.md

"They kept telling me" insteand of "The kept telling me"
"first hand" is your favorite hand, while "firsthand" is the first thing you encouner/learn in this context.
This commit is contained in:
SimonKev 2017-07-13 19:35:04 +03:00 committed by GitHub
parent 4a03bda557
commit 4ef0e6f1d9

View file

@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ Nina argues that current intellectual property laws serve as a roadblock to the
Nina is talking about gatekeepers. They are primarily big corporations that dictate what information can flow to the public and what cant. Nina is talking about gatekeepers. They are primarily big corporations that dictate what information can flow to the public and what cant.
Nina produced a feature film titled *Sita Sings the Blues*. In the film, she used music from the 1920s by a singer named Annette Hanshaw. The songs should have been in the public domain years ago, but they werent due to retroactive copyright extension. As Nina began navigating through the system trying to secure permission to use the music, she learned first hand the power of the gatekeepers: Nina produced a feature film titled *Sita Sings the Blues*. In the film, she used music from the 1920s by a singer named Annette Hanshaw. The songs should have been in the public domain years ago, but they werent due to retroactive copyright extension. As Nina began navigating through the system trying to secure permission to use the music, she learned firsthand the power of the gatekeepers:
>“The kept telling me, Yes Its annoying, but the same system is protecting your intellectual property ... But found copyright holders werent getting more money because of the copyright. What they were getting is the power to suppress art to suppress communication.” >“They kept telling me, Yes Its annoying, but the same system is protecting your intellectual property ... But found copyright holders werent getting more money because of the copyright. What they were getting is the power to suppress art to suppress communication.”
Ultimately, the system doesnt benefit the artists, it doesnt benefit the actual art in question, and it doesnt benefit the public. It benefits the big corporations that hold the rights. As an artist, Nina experienced first hand how the system blocks the free flow of ideas: Ultimately, the system doesnt benefit the artists, it doesnt benefit the actual art in question, and it doesnt benefit the public. It benefits the big corporations that hold the rights. As an artist, Nina experienced firsthand how the system blocks the free flow of ideas:
>“What copyright was doing was blocking the circulation of my comics, which is probably why most of you havent seen my comics.” >“What copyright was doing was blocking the circulation of my comics, which is probably why most of you havent seen my comics.”