LBRYFoundation/lbry.com
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/LBRYFoundation/lbry.com.git synced 2025-08-23 17:47:26 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/lbryio/lbry.io

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Jeremy Kauffman 2016-04-28 13:16:35 -04:00
commit 3cf865849c
1 changed files with 26 additions and 7 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

33
view/posts/36-built-for-artists-by-autists-lbry-takes-autism-personally.md
View file

@ -1,15 +1,34 @@
---
author: lbry
title: 'Built for Artists by Autists: LBRY Takes Autism Personally'
date: '2016-03-21 20:06:18'
title: 'Information Gatekeepers Make Our Culture Sick'
date: '2016-04-26 10:06:18'
---
The free flow of ideas is vital for a healthy, functioning society. When the flow of information is blocked in some way, culture atrophies.
Understanding autism is personal for us.
Nina Paley is a cartoonist and filmmaker. Her TED talk on intellectual property vividly captures the importance of maintaining a free flow of information and ideas.
![Built for Artists by Autists: LBRY Takes Autism Personally](http://i.imgur.com/gDip22e.jpg)
<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/XO9FKQAxWZc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
A recent New York Times [op-ed](http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/03/18/an-experimental-autism-treatment-cost-me-my-marriage/) by John Elder Robison tells the story of his life before and after taking part in a groundbreaking experiment into using an innovative electromagnetic therapy to perhaps remediate a core disability of autism. Robison, who is on the autism spectrum had a successful career and family life, but nevertheless faced personal challenges and decided to try TMS, or transcranial magnetic stimulation, to gain greater insight into the emotional cues and nonverbal communications of other people. Researchers hoped to gain better insight into how TMS might help address these challenges. Robison hopes these insights will one day form the basis of therapies, and he himself experienced great rewards - even from this early stage experiment. The treatment granted him the ability to better read and feel emotions, but it was quite a ride. His marriage fell apart, and many of his personal relationships became strained for years. Conversely, with new eyes, he formed many new relationships, he re-married, and many others relationships grew stronger.
>“We are information transmitters. Information enters through our senses, like our eyes and ears, and it exits through our expressions, like our voices, our writings, our drawings. And all of this information going through us creates a living phenomenon called culture. In order for culture to stay alive, we have to be open – transmitting and receiving information.”
John’s son, Jack Robison, is LBRY’s own core developer. Jack, also on the autism spectrum (and who once [faced 60 years in prison](http://blog.lbry.io/jack-robison-escaped-60-years-in-prison-now-hes-revolutionizing-the-internet/) for misunderstood high school chemistry experiments), has been a steadfast advocate for autism rights. To say autism awareness and understanding is an issue near and dear to our hearts is an understatement.
As Nina puts it, culture is a network and art is made up of the information we have received through culture: “It is through this flow that culture stays alive and we stay connected to each other.”
What’s more, we plan to put our credits where our mouth is and grant a significant sum of LBRY credits to [William and Mary’s neurodiversity program](http://www.wm.edu/sites/neurodiversity/) to further research, education, and outreach into autism.
Block the flow and the culture becomes sick. We become disconnected. It is similar to the way clogged arteries lead to a heart attack. Clogging the free flow of information cripples culture.
Nina argues that current intellectual property laws serve as a roadblock to the free flow of ideas. People become so obsessed with what they can or cannot use, they end up self-censoring. The threat of “getting in trouble” dictates our choices about what we can express.
>“Whenever we censor our expression, we close a little more and information flows a little less. The less information flows, the more it stagnates. Evolution, innovation and progress stall. This is what we call permission culture.”
Nina is talking about gatekeepers. They are primarily big corporations that dictate what information can flow to the public and what can’t.
Nina produced a feature film titled *Sita Sings the Blues*. In the film, she used music from the 1920s by a singer named Annette Hanshaw. The songs should have been in the public domain years ago, but they weren’t due to retroactive copyright extension. As Nina began navigating through the system trying to secure permission to use the music, she learned first hand the power of the gatekeepers:
>“The kept telling me, ‘Yes It’s annoying, but the same system is protecting your intellectual property’ ... But found copyright holders weren’t getting more money because of the copyright. What they were getting is the power to suppress art – to suppress communication.”
Ultimately, the system doesn’t benefit the artists, it doesn’t benefit the actual art in question, and it doesn’t benefit the public. It benefits the big corporations that hold the rights. As an artist, Nina experienced first hand how the system blocks the free flow of ideas:
>“What copyright was doing was blocking the circulation of my comics, which is probably why most of you haven’t seen my comics.”
LBRY seeks to open up the flow of information, to increase connectivity, and support a healthy culture. Through a decentralized platform like LBRY, creators can directly connect with their audience to eliminate the need for byzantine rights enforcement. Your payment goes right to the artist - not to the gatekeepers.
But would LBRY help Nina with her film? Well, she would still need to secure the rights to Annette Hanshaw’s music, but that would be between her and the copyright holders. That reality still exists. But we envision a world without major media corporations – and their fat legal budgets. Most artists we know don’t want to see their work put in a legal cage. They want to be part of the cultural conversation and receive fair compensation for their work. The reason they get stuck in severe copyright agreements is to access the distribution channels of a major record or production company. By creating a massive decentralized content marketplace, we render those companies obsolete. Poof!