lbry-desktop/src/renderer/redux/selectors/publish.js
2018-09-24 20:17:08 -04:00

147 lines
4.7 KiB
JavaScript

import { createSelector } from 'reselect';
import {
parseURI,
selectClaimsById,
selectMyClaimsWithoutChannels,
selectResolvingUris,
buildURI,
selectClaimsByUri,
} from 'lbry-redux';
const selectState = state => state.publish || {};
export const selectPendingPublishes = createSelector(
selectState,
state => state.pendingPublishes.map(pendingClaim => ({ ...pendingClaim, pending: true })) || []
);
export const selectClaimsWithPendingPublishes = createSelector(
selectMyClaimsWithoutChannels,
selectPendingPublishes,
(claims, pendingPublishes) => {
// ensure there are no duplicates, they are being checked for in a setInterval
// no need to wait for it to complete though
// loop through myclaims
// if a claim has the same name as one in pendingPublish, remove it from pending
const claimMap = {};
claims.forEach(claim => {
claimMap[claim.name] = true;
});
const filteredPendingPublishes = pendingPublishes.filter(claim => !claimMap[claim.name]);
return [...filteredPendingPublishes, ...claims];
}
);
export const selectPublishFormValues = createSelector(selectState, state => {
const { pendingPublish, ...formValues } = state;
return formValues;
});
export const selectPendingPublish = uri =>
createSelector(selectPendingPublishes, pendingPublishes => {
const { claimName, contentName } = parseURI(uri);
if (!pendingPublishes.length) {
return null;
}
return pendingPublishes.filter(
publish => publish.name === claimName || publish.name === contentName
)[0];
});
// Is the current uri the same as the uri they clicked "edit" on
export const selectIsStillEditing = createSelector(selectPublishFormValues, publishState => {
const { editingURI, uri } = publishState;
if (!editingURI || !uri) {
return false;
}
const {
isChannel: currentIsChannel,
claimName: currentClaimName,
contentName: currentContentName,
} = parseURI(uri);
const {
isChannel: editIsChannel,
claimName: editClaimName,
contentName: editContentName,
} = parseURI(editingURI);
// Depending on the previous/current use of a channel, we need to compare different things
// ex: going from a channel to anonymous, the new uri won't return contentName, so we need to use claimName
const currentName = currentIsChannel ? currentContentName : currentClaimName;
const editName = editIsChannel ? editContentName : editClaimName;
return currentName === editName;
});
export const selectMyClaimForUri = createSelector(
selectPublishFormValues,
selectIsStillEditing,
selectClaimsById,
selectMyClaimsWithoutChannels,
({ editingURI, uri }, isStillEditing, claimsById, myClaims) => {
const { contentName, claimName } = parseURI(uri);
const { claimId: editClaimId } = parseURI(editingURI);
// If isStillEditing
// They clicked "edit" from the file page
// They haven't changed the channel/name after clicking edit
// Get the claim so they can edit without re-uploading a new file
return isStillEditing
? claimsById[editClaimId]
: myClaims.find(
claim =>
!contentName
? claim.name === claimName
: claim.name === contentName || claim.name === claimName
);
}
);
export const selectIsResolvingPublishUris = createSelector(
selectState,
selectResolvingUris,
({ uri, name }, resolvingUris) => {
if (uri) {
const isResolvingUri = resolvingUris.includes(uri);
const { isChannel } = parseURI(uri);
let isResolvingShortUri;
if (isChannel) {
const shortUri = buildURI({ contentName: name });
isResolvingShortUri = resolvingUris.includes(shortUri);
}
return isResolvingUri || isResolvingShortUri;
}
return false;
}
);
export const selectTakeOverAmount = createSelector(
selectState,
selectMyClaimForUri,
selectClaimsByUri,
({ name }, myClaimForUri, claimsByUri) => {
// We only care about the winning claim for the short uri
const shortUri = buildURI({ contentName: name });
const claimForShortUri = claimsByUri[shortUri];
if (!myClaimForUri && claimForShortUri) {
return claimForShortUri.effective_amount;
} else if (myClaimForUri && claimForShortUri) {
// https://github.com/lbryio/lbry/issues/1476
// We should check the current effective_amount on my claim to see how much additional lbc
// is needed to win the claim. Currently this is not possible during a takeover.
// With this, we could say something like, "You have x lbc in support, if you bid y additional LBC you will control the claim"
// For now just ignore supports. We will just show the winning claim's bid amount
return claimForShortUri.effective_amount || claimForShortUri.amount;
}
return null;
}
);