LBRYFoundation/LBRY-Vault
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/LBRYFoundation/LBRY-Vault.git synced 2025-08-23 09:37:31 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

add new peer_state for the case where we are waiting for the remote party to force close a channel

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
ThomasV 2020-02-11 20:55:52 +01:00
parent 8688a6530a
commit 9ccfa318f8
2 changed files with 4 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

1
electrum/lnchannel.py
View file

@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ class peer_states(IntEnum):
DISCONNECTED = 0
REESTABLISHING = 1
GOOD = 2
BAD = 3
cs = channel_states
state_transitions = [

4
electrum/lnpeer.py
View file

@ -848,10 +848,12 @@ class Peer(Logger):
else:
if dlp_enabled and should_close_they_are_ahead:
self.logger.warning(f"channel_reestablish: remote is ahead of us! luckily DLP is enabled. remote PCP: {bh2u(their_local_pcp)}")
# data_loss_protect_remote_pcp is used in lnsweep
chan.set_data_loss_protect_remote_pcp(their_next_local_ctn - 1, their_local_pcp)
self.lnworker.save_channel(chan)
if should_close_they_are_ahead:
self.logger.warning(f"channel_reestablish: remote is ahead of us! trying to get them to force-close.")
self.logger.warning(f"channel_reestablish: remote is ahead of us! They should force-close.")
chan.peer_state = peer_states.BAD
return
elif should_close_we_are_ahead:
self.logger.warning(f"channel_reestablish: we are ahead of remote! trying to force-close.")